INDIANA TEXTILES MILL,HOWRAH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 44, KOLKATA [FORMERLY ITO, WARD - 43(4)], KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that bad debts written off in the books of accounts are allowable as a deduction. It also held that a limited company cannot incur expenses of a personal nature, thus deleting ad hoc disallowances made on that ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Indiana Textiles Mill, appealed against an order disallowing bad debts and making ad hoc disallowances for various expenses. The appeal was filed with a delay which was condoned by the tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether bad debts written off are allowable as a deduction and whether ad hoc disallowances of expenses on the ground of personal use are justified for a limited company.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- TRF Ltd. v. CIT714 citing323 ITR 397 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, AM]
For the Appellant : Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate For the Revenue : Shri Saurav Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 01.11.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018 ORDER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Kolkata dated 16.01.2018 for the assessment year 2012-13, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act). There is a delay of 82 days in filing of the appeal. After perusing the petition for condonation, I am convinced that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing this appeal. Hence I condone the delay and admit the appeal.
The assessee is a company and is in the business of manufacturing and dealing in hosiery goods. The issues that arises from my consideration in this regard are, the disallowance of bad debts and ad hoc disallowance of various expenditures.
After hearing rival submissions and on a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, a perusal of papers on record and orders of the lower authorities below, as well as case law cited, I hold as follows.
Indiana Textiles Mill A.Yr.2012-13 4. The bad debts of Rs. 2,55,289/- has to be allowed as deduction as it is not disputed that the assessee has written off the same in its books of accounts. These issues covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF reported in 323 ITR 397 (SC). Accordingly, ground no. 2 raised by the assessee is allowed.
Ground nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 are in the issues of ad hoc disallowance of travelling expenses, telephone and conveyance expenses, general expenses and motor car expenses. The Assessing Officer disallowed 20% of these expenses, on the ground that they may have been some personal use. The learned counsel for the assessee relied on the decision of Hon’ble Gujrat High Court for the proposition that there cannot be any personal expenditure in the case of limited company registered under the Company’s Act. Even otherwise it was submitted that the assessing officer has, in an ad hoc manner, restricted the claim of the assessee. I agree with the contentions of the assessee that company cannot be said to have incurred expenses of personal nature. As the disallowance has been made on the ground that part of the expenditure incurred is of a personal nature, I delete the disallowance and allow this ground of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the Court on 28.11.2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026