ITO, WARD - 45(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SEKHAR BARMAN, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect. The assessee's cross objection was also dismissed as infructuous as it did not raise any specific issue.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals) for the assessment year 2010-11. The net tax effect involved in the appeal was less than the prescribed limit by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per CBDT circular. Whether the assessee's cross objection is maintainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “C” KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri, M. Balaganesh
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R
PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:
- This Revenue’s appeal and assessee’s cross objection for assessment year 2010-11 arise from Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13 Kolkata’s order dated 20.04.2018, passed in case No.183/CIT(A)-13/W-45(2)/Kol/2015- 16, in proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’.
We notice at the outset that the Revenue’s grounds are very much clear in its grounds that net tax effect involved in the instant appeal is only ₹11.24 lac. The same is therefore found to be less than ₹ 20 lac as prescribed in the CBDT’s latest Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. We dismiss the Revenue’s instant appeal for low tax effect therefore.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Marico Limited vs. Shree Uday Oil And Food Industries LLPDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Laborate Pharmaceuticals INDIA Limited vs. M/S Jmbs Healthcare Through Its PartnersDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Pharmed Limited vs. Best Biotech & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Kbb Nuts PVT. Limited vs. Mr. Suresh Chand & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Amritsar Haveli Cuisines Private Limited & Anr. vs. Amarbir Singh & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026