SAJJAN KUMAR GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1716/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 December 2018AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the ex parte order violated the principles of natural justice as the assessee was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard. The impugned order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not receive a notice for a hearing before the CIT(A) and therefore could not present their case. The CIT(A) passed an ex parte order without considering the assessment records on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex parte without proper notice to the assessee is valid. Whether principles of natural justice were followed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘D’, KOLKATA

Before: Shri S. S.Viswanethra Ravi, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: Shri Sourav Gupta, FCA, ld.AR
For Respondent: Shri P.K. Mondal, ld.Sr.DR
Pronounced: 07.12.2018

The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-14, Kolkata in Appeal No. 10412/CIT(A)-14/Wd-47(1)/2016-17, dated 25-06-2018, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act), dated 23-12-2016.

2.

At the outset itself, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has pointed out that the assessee did not receive the notice for hearing on 12-06-2018 during the appellate proceedings. Therefore, he could not plead his case before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. Counsel for the assessee further pointed out that the ld. CIT(A) did not consider the assessment records and did not pass his order on merit. Therefore, he prayed before us that one more opportunity may be granted to plead this case before the ld. CIT(A).

Sajjan Kumar Gupta 1

3.

On the other hand, the ld. DR for the revenue did not have any objection, if assessee’s case is remitted back to the file of the ld. CIT(A).

4.

We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We note that the assesse has raised ground no. 1, wherein he stated that he did not get notice for hearing on 12-06-2018. Ground no. 1 raised by the assesse reads as under:- 1. That the action of Ld CIT (Appeals) by passing the order in favour of the revenue on the grounds of no one appeared from the appellant is liable to set aside. We (Appellant) had requested for adjournment for hearing fixed on 31/05/2018 and we did not received the notices for hearing on 12/06/2018. So we were unable to attend the hearing on the mentioned date.”

5.

We note that the impugned order is an ex parte order and the assesse did not get adequate opportunity to plead his case before the ld. CIT(A). We also note that the ld.CIT(A) has not passed the order on merits and did not consider the assessment records. We note that in the assessee’s case under consideration, the assessment was framed by the AO u/s. 143(3) of the Act and impugned order is an ex parte, therefore, we do not wish to comment on merits of the grounds raised by the assesse. We note that the assessee did not get the notice for hearing on 12-06-2018, and could not plead his case. Therefore, we are of the view that this case is against the principle of natural justice. Hence, we are of the view that one more opportunity should be given to the assessee to plead his case before the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, we set aside the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) and remit the issue back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with the direction to adjudicate the issue on merits. We also direct the assesse to file required documents and details to prove his bonafide. Therefore, we allow assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes.

Sajjan Kumar Gupta 1

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on -12-2018 07

Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi) (Dr. A.L.Saini) Judicial Member Accountant Member 07 Dated: -12-2018 *PRADIP (Sr.PS) Copy of the order forwarded to:

1. 1. The Appellant/Assessee: Shri Sajjan Kumar Gupta, 99A Grish Ghosh Road, Liluah, Howrah-711204. 2 The Respondent/Revenue: Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(1), 3 Govt. Place (W), Kolkata-700 001.

3. The CIT-, 4. The CIT(A)-, 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata True Copy, By order, Asst. Registrar ITAT, Kolkata Benches

Sajjan Kumar Gupta 1

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →