DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTD P. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found it appropriate to remand the appeal back to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The assessee was granted liberty to submit additional evidence, and the remand report was to be provided for rebuttal.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order upholding the disallowance of expenses for 'Technical & Professional Services' and 'Printing & Stationery'. The assessee contended that additional evidence was not considered and a remand report was not provided for rebuttal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred by not considering additional evidence and denying the assessee's right of rebuttal by not furnishing the remand report.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri S.S.Godara, JM & Hon’ble Shri M.Balaganesh, AM]
This appeal by the Assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-16, Kolkata [in short the ld CIT(A)] in Appeal No.317/CIT(A)- 16/Cir-15(2)/2014-15 dated 23.05.2017 against the order passed by DCIT, Circle-8, Kolkata [ in short the ld AO] under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 29.11.2010 for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
We find that the assessee had raised several grounds against the action of the ld CITA upholding the disallowance of Rs 14,04,500/- towards ‘Technical & Professional Services’ and Rs 2,68,747/- towards ‘ Printing & Stationery’ by not considering the Development Architects Pvt. Ltd. A.Yr. 2008-09 additional evidences submitted by the assessee before the ld CITA. The assessee pleaded that the remand report obtained from the ld AO was never furnished to the assessee thereby denying the legitimate of the assessee of its right of rebuttal. The ld AR prayed before us for setting aside of this appeal to the file of ld CITA for denovo adjudication of the issues in the light of various evidences and additional evidences submitted by the assessee, with liberty to assessee to furnish fresh evidences in support of its contentions. The ld DR fairly agreed to this proposal of the ld AR.
We have heard the rival submissions. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fit and appropriate, in the interest of justice and fair play, to remand this appeal to the file of ld CITA for de novo adjudication on merits. The assessee is at liberty to furnish additional evidences, if any, in support of its contentions. The copy of remand report already obtained needs to be furnished to the assessee for its rebuttal as per law. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Court on 07.12.2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026