Facts
The assessee, NYX Project Ventures Pvt. Ltd., appealed an ex-parte order from the National Faceless Appeal Centre for AY 2017-18. The appeal was disposed of without providing an opportunity of being heard, despite the assessee's claim that its counsel was ill. The underlying dispute involved an addition by the Assessing Officer for scrap sales, which the assessee contended was already offered as income.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the assessee was genuinely prevented from appearing before the First Appellate Authority due to counsel's illness, thus being deprived of a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned ex-parte order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with a directive to provide the assessee a proper hearing.
Key Issues
Whether the ex-parte disposal of the assessee's appeal by the First Appellate Authority without a proper opportunity of being heard was valid.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT
This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 30.11.2023 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2017-18.
The basic grievance of the assessee is against ex-parte disposal of its appeal by the First Appellate Authority without providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard.
We have considered rival submissions and perused the materials on record. Before us, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that, though, notice of hearing issued by the first appellate authority was received by the assessee, however, due to illness of the counsel, proper representation could not be made resulting in ex-parte disposal of the appeal and confirmation of the addition. He submitted, the assessee has a strong prima facie case on merits, as, by completely misconceiving the facts the Assessing Officer has made the addition on account of scrap sales, though, the assessee has offered such income in its profit and loss account as well as return of income. Thus, it was submitted, the matter may be restored back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Learned Departmental Representative did not express any objection with regard to restoration of the issues to the Assessing Officer.
We have considered rival submissions and perused the materials on record. Undisputedly, the first appellate authority has proceeded to dispose of assessee’s appeal ex-parte alleging non-compliance. Before us, learned counsel appearing for the assessee has furnished an affidavit stating that due to his illness he could not appear before the first appellate authority on the date of hearing.
6. Considering the fact that the assessee was deprived of representing its case before learned first appellate authority for genuine reasons, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of learned first appellate authority and restore the issue to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25th April, 2024