THIRUMANGALAM AGRI PRODUCERS CO-OP MARKETING SOCIETY LTD,MADURAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE II, MADURAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not considered the assessee's written submissions, which contained various details. In the interest of justice, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee contended that their written submissions were not considered by the CIT(A) before confirming the assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly considered the assessee's written submissions before passing the order. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘ B’ SMC BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY
आदेश / O R D E R
PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1(i/c), Madurai in appeal No.0081/2012-13 dated 28.12.2017 for the assessment year 2010-11.
Mr.S.Sridhar represented on behalf of the Assessee, and Mr.B.Sagadevan represented on behalf of the Revenue.
It was submitted by the ld.A.R that in the course of hearing before the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee had filed written submissions on two occasions, which had not been considered by the Ld.CIT(A). It was a submission that the Ld.CIT(A) has confirmed the assessment order without considering the written submissions filed before him. It was a submission that the submissions of the assessee may be considered.
In reply, the ld.D.R submitted that he had no objection to remit the issue in this appeal to the file of ld. Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
We have considered the rival submissions. We have also gone through the written submissions, which have been filed before the Ld.CIT(A). A perusal of written submissions shows that various details have been produced in the written submissions. Admittedly, the assessment order does not talk of verification of these evidences. In these circumstances, in the interest of justice, the issue in this appeal is restored to the file of ld. Assessing Officer for re-adjudication after granting the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court after conclusion of hearing on 27th August, 2018, at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026