CHIRANJEEVI WIND ENERGY LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, COIMBATORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue was covered by an earlier order of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for a different assessment year. Therefore, there was nothing further to adjudicate.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed relief under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act for commission and legal charges incurred for arranging working capital funds. The Assessing Officer denied this relief.
What were the issues?
Whether commission and legal charges incurred for arranging working capital funds are eligible for deduction under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY]
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
In this appeal filed by the assessee, which is directed against an order dated 30.06.2017 of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Coimbatore, it is aggrieved on relief not being given u/s.35D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘’the Act’’) for commission payment and legal charges incurred in connection with arrangement of funds for working capital.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee admitted that the issue in 2. question stood covered against the assessee by an earlier order dated 21.10.2013 by this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in for assessment year 2009-2010. Accordingly, considering the submission made by the ld. Authorised Representative, there is nothing left to adjudicate.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.
More judgments on Section 35D
- Yashpal Singh Yadav, Noida vs ACIT Circle-2(3)91), JhansiITA 443/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT-4(1), Indore vs Texmo Pipes and Products Limited, BurhanpurITA 423/IND/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Income Tax Officer Ward 7 1, Pune vs Sarsan Developers, PuneITA 460/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed4 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Road Infrastructure Development Company of… vs ACIT, Circle 6, Jaipur, Central Revenue…ITA 1425/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- Sanraj Hospitality Private Ltd, Delhi vs ITO Ward 22(3), DelhiITA 7410/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026