HARI KISHAN LOHIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 47, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found it appropriate to remand the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The assessee was granted liberty to submit supporting evidence for their contentions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee sought a remand to the CIT(A) due to being out of station and lack of instructions during the initial appeal proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration due to the assessee's non-compliance with appeal proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D”, KOLKATA
ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 15.06.2018 passed by CIT(A)-14, Kolkata for AY 2014-15.
Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. Ld.AR placed on record the affidavit dated 30.11.2018 submitted by the assessee stating reasons for non-compliance before the CIT(A). Ld.AR referred to para 5 of the said affidavit and argued that the assessee was out of station from the period of fixation of first appeal before the CIT(A) and no instruction was available on record before the CIT(A). Ld.AR submits that the assessee is ready to prosecute its case before the CIT(A) if this Tribunal pleases to remand the matter to the file of CIT(A) for his fresh consideration. Ld.DR opposed the same and referred to para 2 of the impugned order and argued that the CIT(A) has given ample opportunity to the assessee and the assessee fail to comply the same. Taking into consideration the said facts and the submissions of Ld.DR & Ld.AR and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2014-15) CIT(A) for his fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of his contention. Thus, grounds raised
by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 12.12.2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (A.L.SAINI) (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER [ Date:- 12.12.2018 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to:
1. 1. Appellant- Hari Kishan Lohia, Flat No.9A/1, 9th Floor, Satyam Tower, 3 Alipore Road, Kolkata-700027.
2. Respondent- DCIT, Circle-47, 3, Govt. Place (West), Kolkata-700001.
3. CIT-Kolkata 4. CIT(Appeals)-Kolkata 5. DR: ITAT -Kolkata Benches
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026