HARI KISHAN LOHIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 47, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1735/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 December 2018AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found it appropriate to remand the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The assessee was granted liberty to submit supporting evidence for their contentions.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee sought a remand to the CIT(A) due to being out of station and lack of instructions during the initial appeal proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration due to the assessee's non-compliance with appeal proceedings.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D”, KOLKATA

Hearing: 04.12.2018

ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 15.06.2018 passed by CIT(A)-14, Kolkata for AY 2014-15.

2.

Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. Ld.AR placed on record the affidavit dated 30.11.2018 submitted by the assessee stating reasons for non-compliance before the CIT(A). Ld.AR referred to para 5 of the said affidavit and argued that the assessee was out of station from the period of fixation of first appeal before the CIT(A) and no instruction was available on record before the CIT(A). Ld.AR submits that the assessee is ready to prosecute its case before the CIT(A) if this Tribunal pleases to remand the matter to the file of CIT(A) for his fresh consideration. Ld.DR opposed the same and referred to para 2 of the impugned order and argued that the CIT(A) has given ample opportunity to the assessee and the assessee fail to comply the same. Taking into consideration the said facts and the submissions of Ld.DR & Ld.AR and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2014-15) CIT(A) for his fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of his contention. Thus, grounds raised

by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 12.12.2018.

Sd/- Sd/- (A.L.SAINI) (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER [ Date:- 12.12.2018 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to:

1. 1. Appellant- Hari Kishan Lohia, Flat No.9A/1, 9th Floor, Satyam Tower, 3 Alipore Road, Kolkata-700027.

2. Respondent- DCIT, Circle-47, 3, Govt. Place (West), Kolkata-700001.

3. CIT-Kolkata 4. CIT(Appeals)-Kolkata 5. DR: ITAT -Kolkata Benches

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →