PIONEER FIL-MED PVT. LTD.,NEHRU PLACE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
Referring to the Delhi High Court's decision in PCIT vs. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd., the Tribunal held that no disallowance under Section 14A is permissible in the absence of exempt income, a principle applicable up to A.Y. 2021-22. Since the assessee had no exempt income, the disallowance confirmed by the CIT(A) was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order confirming a disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules. The central point of contention was that the assessee had not earned any dividend income for the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules is justified when the assessee has not earned any exempt/dividend income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing448 ITR 674 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
ORDER
PER M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal filed by the assessee in for A.Y. 2017-18 arises out of the order by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ld CIT(A) in short).
Though the assessee has raised several grounds, the only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the learned CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowance made under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules specially when the assessee has not earned any dividend income at all.
We have heard rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The issue in dispute is no longer res integra in view of the recent decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd. reported in 448 ITR 674 wherein the Hon’ble Delhi High Court even after considering the amendment brought by Finance Act, 2022 in Section 14A by holding that the said amendment could only be given prospective application had held that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance under section 14A of the Act could be made up to A.Y. 2021-22. In the instant case, there is no dispute that there is no exempt income derived by the assessee and hence, the ratio of the aforesaid decision squarely applies to the instant case. Hence, grounds raised by the assessee are hereby allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29.04.2024
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026