ACIT, CHENNAI vs. PERI SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that if the employees' contribution to PF & ESI is deposited after the due date prescribed by the relevant Act but before the due date of filing the Income Tax return, no disallowance can be made. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed the employees' contribution to PF & ESI claimed by the assessee, as it was paid after the due date under Section 36(1)(va) but before the due date for filing the return of income. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal following jurisdictional High Court and Tribunal decisions.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of employees' contribution to PF & ESI is warranted when paid after the statutory due date but before the due date of filing the return of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश/ O R D E R
PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Chennai in dated 27.10.2017 for assessment year 2013-14.
M/s. Peri Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd., the assessee, is engaged in the business of software development. While making the assessment for assessment year 2013-14, the Assessing Officer, inter alia, found that the assessee claimed Employees contribution for PF & ESI, totalling at Rs. 51,56,335/-, which were paid not within the due date mentioned as per section 36(1)(va) and hence he disallowed. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) following the jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of CIT vs Industrial Security & Intelligence Pvt Ltd., vide & 2049/Mds/2014 dated 24.07.2015, wherein, it was held that “if the assessee had deposited Employees contribution towards PF & ESI after the due date as prescribed under the relevant Act, but before the due date of filing return under the Income Tax Act, no disallowance could be made” and also the decision of the Chennai tribunal vide ITA No. 754/Mds/2016 dated 03.06.2016 allowed the assessee’s appeal. Aggrieved against that order, the Revenue filed this appeal.
We heard the rival submissions. Since, the Ld. CIT(A) applied the ratio of the jurisdictional High Court decision, we do not find any reason to interfere with his order. The Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced on Thursday, the 30th day of August, 2018 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026