INCOME TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.DUSTERS TOTAL SOLUTIONS SERVICES PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1603/BANG/2016Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 December 2017AY 2013-143 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision on belated PF/ESI contributions. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's cross objections regarding Section 14A disallowance, relying on a co-ordinate bench decision.

What were the facts?

The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing deduction for belated PF and ESI contributions. The assessee filed cross objections challenging the disallowance under Section 14A despite no exempt income.

What were the issues?

Whether belated remittance of PF and ESI contributions is eligible for deduction. Whether Section 14A disallowance is warranted in the absence of exempt income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, BENGALURU

Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

For Appellant: Shri R.Vijayaraghavan, CA
For Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Addl.CIT(DR)
Hearing: 21/09/2017Pronounced: 19/12/2017

This is an appeal filed by the revenue directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Bengaluru,[CIT(A)], dated 15/06/2016 for the assessment year 2013-14. The assessee has filed cross objections.

3.

The revenue raised the following grounds of appeal:

4. The only issue in the present appeal is whether belated remittance of PF and ESI contribution under respective laws but within due date for filing of return of income is eligible for deduction. This issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee-company by the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sabari Enterprises (298 ITR 141). The CIT(A), following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the above case allowed the appeal. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the CIT(A). Hence, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.

5. The cross objections filed by the assessee challenge the finding of the CIT(A) that 14A disallowance is warranted even in absence of exempt income. Now, the issue is squarely covered by the ITAT decision in & 1482/Bang/2015 dated 09/06/2017 in the case of the assessee for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. In the light of the co-ordinate bench decision, the cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →