ITO, BHIWANI vs. SERVE HITKARI SHIKSHA SAMITI, BHIWANI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the threshold stipulated by CBDT Instruction No. 21/2015. Consequently, the departmental appeal was deemed not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting an addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- made on account of corpus fund. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 10,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect, as per CBDT instructions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K.PANDA
ORDER Per R.K.Panda, AM:
This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated 31st March, 2017 of the CIT(A)- Hisar relating to assessment year 2012-13. 2. The revenue in its only effective ground of appeal has challenged the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- made on account of corpus fund.
3. An adjournment application has been filed by ld. DR seeking adjournment of the case. However, considering the low tax effect involved in the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue, the same is rejected and the appeal is taken up for adjudication.
2 (Serve Hitkari Shiksha Samiti) 4. It was seen that the tax effect involved in the ground raised by the revenue is less than 10,00,000/-. When same was confronted to ld. DR, he also fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the revenue is below 10 lakhs. Therefore, following the recent CBDT Instruction no. 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015, the departmental appeal is not maintainable. Accordingly the appeal filed by the revenue dismissed on account of low tax effect.
5. In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court at the time of hearing itself i.e. on 25.09.2017)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026