ITO (TDS), GURGAON vs. M/S THE GURGAON CENTRAL COOP. BANK LTD, VILL. JAMALPUR, GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect in the recalled appeals was below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. Therefore, the appeals were not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed miscellaneous applications stating that the tax effect in certain appeals was incorrectly assessed as below Rs. 10 lakhs, when it was actually higher. The ITAT found a mistake and recalled the appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the department, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, apply to pending appeals and if the tax effect in the present appeals falls below this limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “Friday”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S.SIDHU & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
All these three miscellaneous applications are preferred by the ld AO stating that ITAT has passed a common order in respect of four assessee’s stating that the tax effect in the aforementioned cases are below Rs. 10 lakhs, however, the tax effect of the said cases were more than Rs. 10 lakhs.
2. On carefully consideration it was found that there is a mistake apparent on record as all these six cases the tax effect is more than Rs. 10 lakhs as mentioned under:- S.N o. Name of the assessee A.Y. Tax Effect ITA No.
The Gurgaon Central 2013-14 13,11,841/- 6707/Del/2015 Page | 1 Coop. Bank, Vill. Jamalpur, Gurgaon 4. The Gurgaon Central 2012-13 14,63,897/- 6715/Del/2015 Coop. Bank, Vill. Basai, P.O. Basai, Haryana 2013-14 14,87,772/- 6716/Del/2015 3. In view of this we recall 6516 & 6707/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year: 2012-13 to 2013-14.
In the result the miscellaneous applications filed by the AO are allowed.
However, at the time of hearing it was noticed that tax effect revised upwardly to Rs. 50 lakhs from Rs. 10 lacs as all these six appeals the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 laks following Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08th August 2019 has enhanced the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hon’ble High Courts and Hon’ble Supreme Court. The relevant para of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under :- “2. As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income- tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax Monetary Limit (Rs.) matters 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 50.00,000 2. Before High Court 1.00.00.000 3. Before Supreme Court 2.00,00.000 3. Further, with a view to provide parity in filing of appeals in scenarios where separate order is passed by higher appellate authorities for each assessment year vis-a-vis where composite order for more than one assessment years is passed, para 5 of the circular is substituted by the following para: "5. The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee. the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary' limit specified in para 3. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or y ears in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or appellate authority which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than Page | 2
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026