SKN INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT CIRCLE -4(1), GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex parte for non-prosecution, without recording findings on the grounds raised. In the interest of justice, the ITAT restored the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for a fresh decision in accordance with law, ensuring the assessee is provided an adequate opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee, SKN Infrastructure Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-NFAC for AY 2015-16, which had been dismissed ex parte for non-prosecution without addressing the merits. The assessee's counsel requested the ITAT to restore the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) for a decision on merits, a request to which the Ld. DR had no objection.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A)'s ex parte dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution, without deciding on merits, necessitates restoration to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & DR. BRR KUMAR
Assessee by Shri Vishal Kalra, Adv. & Shri Ankit Sahni, Adv. Revenue by Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR सुनवाईक�तारीख/ Date of hearing: 01.02.2024 30.04.2024 उ�ोषणाक�तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 14.02.2023 for the AY 2015-16.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the appeal is disposed of by the Ld.CIT(A) ex parte for non-prosecution of the appeal and not decided various grounds raised before him on merits. Therefore, the Ld. Counsel submits that the matter may be I.T.A.No.1069/Del/2023 restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) for deciding the issues on merits.
Ld. DR has no serious objection.
On hearing both the sides and perusing the order of the Ld.CIT(A), we observe that the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution. The Ld. CIT(A) did not record any findings on each of the grounds raised by the assessee. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this appeal is restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) for deciding afresh in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30/04/2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026