SAMARNIYA PROPERTIES P.LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 8(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 17/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 June 2018AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal followed the Special Bench decision in Vireet Investment (P) Ltd, which held that computation under section 115JB(2)(f) should not resort to section 14A. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh computation.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal concerned the confirmation of an addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 14A to the book profit computed under section 115JB. The assessee argued that this issue was covered by a Special Bench decision.

What were the issues?

Whether disallowances under section 14A should be made while computing book profit under section 115JB.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A,Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Order Under Section 254(1) of Income –tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER; 1. The instant appeal by assessee under section 253 of the Income-tax Act (the Act) is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-50 [ld. CIT(A)], Mumbai dated 26.10.2016 for Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee has raised sole ground of appeal

that the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in making addition of disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to the book profit computed under section 115JB of the Act.

2. At the outset of the hearing, the ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee submits that the sole ground of appeal raised by the assessee in the appeal is covered in favour of assessee by the decision of Special Bench of the Tribunal in ACIT versus Vireet Investment (P) Ltd [2017] 82 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi-Tribunal)(SB). On going through the grounds of appeal and the learned DR of the revenue and the contents of the decision in Vireet Investment (P) Ltd (supra), the learned the DR for the revenue conceded that the ground raised by assessee is covered in favour of M/s Smarniya Properties Pvt. Ltd. assessee. The learned DR prayed that grounds of appeal may be restored to the file of assessing officer for computation under section 115JB in accordance with the direction of decision of Special Bench referred above.

3. We have considered the rival submission of the parties and have gone through the orders of authorities below. We have noted that the Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal in Vireet Investment (P) Ltd held that computation under clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115 JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated under section 14A read with Rule 8D. Therefore, respectfully following the decision of Special Bench the ground of appeal raised by the assessee is restored to the file of assessing officer to make the fresh computation by following the decision of Vireet Investment (P) Ltd (supra). Needless to say that the assessing officer shall grant opportunity of hearing to the assessee before passing the order in accordance with law. Hence, the ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

4. In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 18.06.2018 at the time of hearing.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →