ITO (EXEMPTIONS), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. INDIAN NATIONAL THEATRE TRUST, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 165/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 October 2017AY 2010-114 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that there was no change in the assessee's activities and that the issue was covered by previous decisions of the jurisdictional High Court and the ITAT. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a society registered under section 12A, carried out charitable activities including renting out an auditorium. The Assessing Officer denied exemption under section 11, stating the activities were business-like and not charitable under the amended section 2(15). The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, relying on previous decisions in the assessee's own case.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's activities, including renting out an auditorium, constituted business and were therefore not charitable under the amended Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, disentitling it from exemption under Section 11.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(15),Section 11,Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu

Hearing: 10.10.2017Pronounced: 11.10.2017

ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order of ld. CIT(A)-XI, New Delhi dated 09.10.2014 for A.Y. 2010-11 on the following ground : “

1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee society is a charitable organization despite the fact that the assessee society was doing business within the meaning of amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.”

2. As emerged from the above ground of appeal and the facts attending to the present case, we observe that the only issue to be decided in this appeal is whether the assessee is eligible for exemption on its income u/s. 11 of the IT

ITA No. 165/Del./2015 2 Act or not. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee society is registered u/s. 12A of the IT Act with the object to carry out charitable activities to promote artistic and cultural expression through drama, music and education. The assessee company was in possession of premises which also consists of an auditorium which is provided to various charitable institutions for the purpose of artistic and cultural programmes. A portion of the premises was also given on rent to derive regular income to support the charitable activities. The Assessing Officer analyzing the activities of the assessee in terms of amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Act, observed that the assessee was indulged in advancement of object of general public utility and that the principal activity of assessee was to let out the auditorium with clear profit motive and as such the assessee-organization cannot be regarded as charitable organization. He, therefore, denied exemption u/s. 11 of the Act to the assessee-society on its income and accordingly assessed the total income of Rs.1,08,84,519/- to tax. The ld. CIT(A), after following the decisions of ITAT Delhi Benches in assessee’s own cases for A.Y, 1986-87 to 1988-89 vide order dated 22.04.1999, decision of High Court in assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2008- 09 and again the decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench in assessee’s case for A.Y. 2009-10, wherein the same activities of the assessee society were held to be charitable in nature, allowed the appeal of the assessee observing as under :

ITA No. 165/Del./2015 3

“7.4. It is observed that there is no change in the activities of the appellant Society for the year under consideration and these are similar to AY 2008- 09 and 2009-10 and as well as in preceding years wherein the Hon'ble Courts have held that activities conducted by the appellant society are charitable in nature. Therefore, the amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Act is not at all attracted because basic character of the Society has been held to be charitable in nature. In view of the fact that there is no change in the activities of the appellant from earlier years, the findings made by the Hon'ble Courts in earlier years in appellant's own case clearly cover the present issue under appeal. Following the same the grounds of appeal are allowed and the appellant is entitled for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The consequential grounds of appeal are allowed in view of the main issue decided in the appellant's favour. Therefore, grounds of appeal are allowed.”

3. The learned DR relied on the order of the AO and submitted that the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in allowing the exemption u/s. 11 of the Act ignoring the fact that the activities of the assessee society were not charitable in terms of amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Act. The ld. AR of the assessee- society, on the other relied on the impugned order.

4. Having considered the rival submissions in the light of material available on record, we find no justification to interfere with the impugned order. It is notable that the issue under consideration is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2008-09 and again by the order of ITAT, Delhi Bench in assessee’s case for A.Y. 2009-10, wherein the same activities of the assessee society were held to be charitable in nature. The ld. learned CIT(A)

ITA No. 165/Del./2015 4 has reproduced the relevant extracts of the above decisions in the impugned order, against which no material is placed before us on behalf of the Revenue to deviate from the view already formed by Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court as well as by coordinate Bench, as noted above. There being no change in the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to disturb the findings reached by the ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order while allowing the appeal of the assessee. We, accordingly, find the appeal of the Revenue devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.

More judgments on Section 2(15)

All 2,878 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(15) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →