GOUR MOHAN KUNDU,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. ITO, WARD - 49(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal found that neither party provided sufficient basis for their net profit estimations. Therefore, the tribunal decided to estimate the net profit at 4% as a fair compromise.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer treated cash deposits as turnover and rejected the assessee's declared net profit of 2.22%, re-estimating it at 8%. The CIT(A) upheld this decision. The assessee did not challenge the rejection of its books of account.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the estimation of the assessee's net profit percentage after the rejection of its books of account. The tribunal had to determine a fair net profit rate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC” KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S, Godara
O R D E R This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata’s order dated 08.03.2018 passed in case No.370/CIT(A)-15/155-16/Wd-49(1)/Kol involving proceedings u/s. 145 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Case file suggests at the outset that I need not dig into deeper in facts of the case since the issue between the parties is that of estimation of net profit only. The Assessing Officer treated assessee’s cash deposits other than in interest of ₹1,77,73,703/- to be turnover from assessee’s edible oil trading business. The taxpayer had declared net profit percentage thereupon @ 2.22%. The Assessing Officer rejected its books to be not indicating true picture to re-estimate the same @ 8% coming to ₹14,23,351/-. The CIT(A) has affirmed the same.
More judgments on Section 145
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6507/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6506/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Mintu Lal, Ranchi vs Assessing Officer, RanchiITA 140/RAN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ontic Finserve Limited, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward -3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1924/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026