CSG INTERNATIONAL LTD.,LONDON vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) referred to its previous decision for AY 2003-04 and the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT. The Tribunal held that payments for software licenses and maintenance services, which merely grant a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use a copyrighted product, do not constitute 'royalty' under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act or Article 13 of the DTAA. It emphasized that DTAA definitions for royalty remain unaffected by retrospective amendments to the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
CSG International Ltd., a UK company, provided software licenses and maintenance services to Indian customers (Bharti, Ericsson, Motorola). For AY 2005-06, the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) treated the payments, including Rs. 365,090,258/-, as 'royalty' taxable under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA. The assessee contended that these payments were for the sale of copyrighted articles, not copyright, and thus constituted business profits, not royalty, arguing that the transaction involved a limited, non-exclusive right to use the software.
What were the issues?
Whether payments for software licenses and maintenance services are taxable as 'royalty' under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the India-UK DTAA. Whether the Supreme Court's judgment in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT applies to the facts of the present case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 9(1)(vi), Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 9(1)(vii), Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 195, Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 197, Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 208, Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 209(1)(d), Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 234B, Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 234D, Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 143(3), Finance Act 2012 (Explanation 4 to Section 9(1)(vi)), Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and United Kingdom: Article 13, Indian Copyright Act, 1957: Section 14(a), Indian Copyright Act, 1957: Section 14(b), Indian Copyright Act, 1957: Section 30
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)-11, New Delhi dated 18.01.2011 for the AY 2005-06. The assessee raised the following grounds: -
“1. That the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [‘Ld. CIT(A)’] has grossly erred, both on facts and in law in upholding the order of Learned Assessing Officer (‘Ld. AO’) and in taxing the revenue earned by the I.T.A.No.1522/Del/2011
Appellant from supply of software as ‘royalty’ under Article 13 of Do
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026