N SRINIVASAN,NAMAKKAL vs. ACIT, NAMAKKAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal heard the Departmental Representative and noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessee later submitted a letter requesting to withdraw the appeal, stating that the subsequent assessment was completed without any additions to the original income.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn based on the subsequent assessment order and the assessee's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem, dated 01.03.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2013-14.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, no one appeared for the assessee. However, the Registry has placed on record a letter dated 30th July, 2018 received from the assessee. In the letter, the assessee claims that consequent to the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), further assessment was completed without any addition to the original income. Therefore, the assessee prayed for permission to withdraw the above appeal.
We heard Ms. D. Rohini, the Ld. Departmental Representative. Since the assessment was completed consequent to the order passed by the Principal CIT under Section 263 of the Act, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court after conclusion of hearing on 1st October, 2018 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026