DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. IDEAL FASTENERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for computing deduction under Section 10AA, the numerator and denominator must be based on the same factors. If foreign currency expenditure is reduced from export turnover, it must also be reduced from total turnover to correctly determine profit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order directing the exclusion of foreign currency expenditure from total turnover for Section 10AA deduction. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether foreign currency expenditure should be excluded from total turnover for calculating deduction under Section 10AA, in addition to export turnover.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -6, Chennai, dated 28.12.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15.
No one appeared for the assessee when the appeal was taken up for hearing. Therefore, we heard the Ld. Departmental Representative and proceeded to dispose the appeal on merit.
Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that there is no provision in the Income-tax Act to reduce the expenditure incurred in foreign currency from total turnover also for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). The Ld. D.R. pointed out that Explanation- 2(iv) to Section 10A of the Act requires adjustment only in respect of export turnover and not total turnover. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the CIT(Appeals) is not correct in directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the expenditure incurred by the assessee in foreign currency from the total turnover also.
We heard the Ld. D.R. and perused the relevant material available on record. The numerator and denominator shall be of the same factor for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 10AA of the Act. If the overseas travel and communication expenditure incurred by the assessee in foreign currency was reduced from export turnover, the same shall also be reduced from total turnover, otherwise the profit of the assessee may not be correctly determined. What is to be excluded from the export turnover needs to be excluded from the total turnover also. In view of the above, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 10AA
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore vs Eygbs(India) Private Limited, BangaloreITA 1886/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs Galaxy Surfactants Limited, MumbaiITA 6984/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Genpact Infrastructure (Hyderabad) Pvt… vs ITO, New DelhiITA 2055/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026