BRAHAM SINGH,FARIDABAD, HARYANA vs. ITO WARD 1(1), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3475/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2024AY 2017-2018Bench: SHRI KUL BHARAT (Judicial Member), SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH (Accountant Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Departmental Representative did not raise any objection to the assessee's request for withdrawal. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Braham Singh, had filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2017-18. Subsequently, the assessee's counsel submitted an application on May 9, 2024, requesting to withdraw the filed appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal should allow an assessee to withdraw their appeal when the Departmental Representative has no objection.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Sunder Mangla, CA
For Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Pronounced: 09.05.2024

O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, JM: At the outset learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal filed by him. An application (dated 09.05.2024) to this effect has also been filed by the assessee. Learned DR raised no we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal.

3.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in open court on 09.05.2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →