SANSKRITI RAKSHA SAMITI TRUST,KRISHNA NAGAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) NEW DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the impugned order was silent on the mode and actual service of notices. Concluding that the ends of justice would be served by allowing the assessee an opportunity to contest on merits, the Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh order after providing the assessee a proper hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) due to the assessee's failure to respond to requests for information. The assessee contended that non-receipt of notices was due to a wrong email address.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for registration under section 12AA was rightly rejected in light of alleged non-receipt of notices by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 08.08.2023 in Application No. CIT(Exemption), Delhi/2023-24/12AA/10356 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), New Delhi, dismissing application for Registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’).
ITA No.- 1763/Del/2024 Sanskriti Raksha Samiti Trust Heard and perused the records. 2.
The Assessee has filed an application for early hearing of the appeal arising out of challenge of order dated 08.08.2023 passed by CIT(Exemption) Delhi, wherein the application of the assessee in Form 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) was rejected. On hearing, the Ld. AR, it comes ups that the impugned order was passed on the basis that, when relevant information was called by CIT(E), assessee had failed to respond. The claim of the assessee is that due to wrong email address, assessee did not receive notices.
After taking into consideration the impugned order, it comes up that the same is silent with regard to the mode of service to the applicant and if notices were actually served. The Ld. DR has tried to defend the impugned order but we are satisfied that the end of justice will be served by giving the assessee an opportunity to contest of merits.
In the light of aforesaid, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, and the issue on merit is restored to the files of the Ld. CIT(E), Delhi, to pass an order fresh, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 17 .05.2024
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026