SRI PICKLU PAUL,KARIMGANJ vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SILCHAR, SILCHAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 195/GTY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 January 2025AY 2014-15Bench: SRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT (KZ) & SRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)12 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had enhanced the income without considering the assessee's submissions and that the treatment of sales and stock was not in consonance with accounting principles. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee was intercepted with a large sum of cash, and a survey was conducted at his business premises. During the assessment, an addition of Rs. 67,00,043/- was made as unexplained cash credit, and the CIT(A) further enhanced the income. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.

What were the issues?

Whether the addition and enhancement of income were justified, considering the assessee's submissions and accounting principles. The proper treatment of unexplained cash sales and stock valuation.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 133A,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 251,Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI BENCH AT KOLKATA

Before: SRI DUVVURU RL REDDY(KZ) & SRI RAKESH MISHRA

order

: January 28th, 2025 ORDER

PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,598 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →