COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,TRIVANDRUM vs. SMT.B.SHYLAJA,ASWATHI ENTERPRISE,KOLLAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA/10/2009HC KeralaKLHC01024771200929 July 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the Supreme Court in S.C. Naregal v Commissioner of Income Tax had dismissed appeals falling within the ambit of the CBDT Circular. Applying this precedent, the High Court held the present appeal was not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The value of the appeal was below the limit prescribed by a CBDT Circular.

What were the issues?

Maintainability of the appeal before the High Court due to its low valuation as per CBDT Circular and Supreme Court precedent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1943 ITA NO. 10 OF 2009 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 778/2005 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,TRIVANDRUM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT: SMT.B.SHYLAJA,ASWATHI ENTERPRISE,KOLLAM BEACH ROAD,KOLLAM. BY ADV SRI.S.ARUN RAJ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ITA No.10 of 2009 JUDGMENT S.V.Bhatti, J. The Revenue is the appellant in the instant appeal. 2. Heard learned Standing counsel Sri Jose Joseph for the appellant and Adv.S.Arunraj for respondent. 3. The value in the appeal is less than the limit prescribed by CBDT Circular. The Supreme Court in the judgment reported in S.C.Naregal v Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) 418 ITR 455 (SC) has considered the effect of CBDT Circular and dismissed the appeal coming within the purport of CBDT Circular. 4. The valuation of the subject appeal, since is less than the limit stipulated by CBDT Circular, and also the judgment of Apex Court in S.C.Naregal (supra) is applicable to the appeal. Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we are of the view that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI Judge sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS Judge css/

ITA No.10 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANN.A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 22.3.2002. ANN.B TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMR. OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 8.2.2005. ANN.C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 28.9.2006.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →