ANDRITZ AG,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that payments received for offshore supply of design and engineering, when part of composite contracts for plant and equipment supply, are not taxable as FTS if the plant and equipment supply is not taxable. Reimbursement of costs without markup is also not taxable as FTS.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident Austrian company, received payments for offshore supply of design and engineering, offshore supply of plants and equipment, and onshore supervisory services from Indian clients. The Assessing Officer treated offshore design and engineering fees as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) taxable in India.
What were the issues?
Whether offshore supply of design and engineering services, as part of composite contracts, are taxable as FTS in India. Whether cost reimbursements without markup are taxable as FTS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Director of Income Tax v. A. P Moller Maersk A. S48 citing78 Taxmann.com 287 · 2017 · SC
- CIT v. Mitsui Engineering and Ship Building32 citing174 CTR 66 · HC
- CIT v. Andhra Petrochemicals Ltd.25 citing373 ITR 207 · 2015
- CIT v. Expeditors International (India) Pvt. Ltd.14 citing24 Taxmann.com 76 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- SMS Concast AG v. DDIT, 110 ITR (T) 138 (Delhi-Trib)13 citing157 Taxmann.com 64 · 2023
- (i) SMS Concast AG v. DDIT4 citing153 Taxmann.com 718 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT
Captioned appeals, three by the assessee and one by Revenue, arise out of three separate orders of learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi, pertaining to assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2014-15. Since, the appeals involve common issues, they have
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026