GOPAL KUMAR,DELHI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
Facts
The assessee appealed an order from the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) for the assessment year 2015-16, which originated from an order under Section 143(3). The CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal ex parte, despite condoning a delay in filing, without clearly establishing proper notice service or providing an adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Held
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter back to the CIT(Appeals). The ITAT directed the CIT(Appeals) to serve proper notice to the assessee and pass a fresh order on merits, emphasizing that the mode of notice service and the assessee's actual knowledge were not clear from the CIT(Appeals)'s order.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal ex parte without providing adequate opportunity of hearing and ensuring proper service of notice to the assessee, particularly when the delay in filing the appeal was already condoned.
Sections Cited
143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
The assessee has come up in appeal against the order dated 30.11.2023
passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter
2 ITA no. 284/Del/2024 referred as “learned First Appellate Authority” or in short “FAA”), in Appeal no.
NFAC/2014-15/10167804 for the assessment year 2015-16, arising out of the order
dated 30.03.2022, u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as
the “Act”), passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (hereinafter
referred in short as “Ld. AO”).
Heard and perused the record. At the time of hearing it comes up that
amongst other grounds on merits, assessee has raised a ground that assessee did not
have reasonable and adequate opportunity of hearing before CIT(Appeals).
Learned DR has, however, countered it by submitting that assessee was given due
notice of hearing.
As we appreciate the impugned order of CIT(Appeals) it comes up that there
was delay in filing appeal before CIT(Appeals) which was condoned. In para 5
CIT(Appeals) observes about notices being issued on few occasions. However, the
mode of service of notice and the fact if the notices were served to the knowledge
of assessee are not coming up from the impugned order of CIT(Appeals). Thus,
proceeding, ex parte, without entering into merits of the submissions of assessee,
the appeal was dismissed, which cannot be said to be in accordance with law.
3 ITA no. 284/Del/2024 4. Accordingly, we allow the appeal for statistical purposes and restore the
issue on merits to the file of CIT(Appeals) with directions to serve notice upon the
assessee and pass an order afresh.
Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in open court on 28.06.2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (G.S. PANNU) (ANUBHAV SHARMA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER *MP* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI
