BIRLA AIRCON,MEERUT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, MEERUT
Facts
The assessee, M/s Birla Aircon, engaged in manufacturing, filed a return declaring a loss. The case was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3), and the assessment resulted in a significantly higher income. The CIT(A) affirmed several additions made by the AO, including disallowance of interest on unsecured loans, additions for securities/advances received from customers, unaccounted purchases, and profit on unaccounted sales.
Held
The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of interest on unsecured loans to the Assessing Officer for re-computation, directing consideration of all loans and production of bank statements by the assessee. For issues related to securities/advances and stock/profit arising from a Central Excise search, the assessee was directed to produce relevant bank statements and orders from Central Excise authorities, respectively, for the AO's re-adjudication. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in sustaining various additions, including disallowance of interest and additions for securities/advances, unaccounted purchases, and profit on unaccounted sales, especially when the assessee's books were seized by the Excise and Custom Department and a Central Excise search was conducted.
Sections Cited
131, 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Kul BharatDr. B. R. R. Kumar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Kul Bharat, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 6848/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 M/s Birla Aircon, Vs. ACIT, 35/15, Purani Delhi Chungi, Circle-1, H.K. Jain, Adv. Meerut-250001 Meerut-250001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AACFB3156E Assessee by : Sh. Shivam Garg, Adv. & Sh. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Kanav Bali, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 25.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 28.06.2024 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A), Meerut dated 28.08.2018. 2. Following grounds have been raised by the assessee:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred on facts as well as on law in sustaining the order of AO. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in observing that the books of accounts were there with the assessee and it has deliberately not produced the same before the AO ignoring that books were seized by the Excise and Custom Department. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in holding that AO was correct in not issuing the summon u/s 131 to Custom Department for release of books.
ITA No. 6848/Del/2018 2 Birla Aircon 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.8,63,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance of interest paid on unsecured loans. 5. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.32,00,000/- made by the AO on account of securities received from the customers. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.5,00,000/- made by the AO on account of advances received from the customer. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.8,11,817/- on account of unaccounted purchases made by the assessee. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs. 27,70,641/- on account of profit earned on unaccounted sales.” 3. The assessee is a firm engaged in manufacturing and sale of ACs, gysers and water coolers etc. The assessee filed return of income on 31.10.2001 declaring loss of Rs.7,93,970/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been framed on 29.03.2004 assessing the income of Rs.1,24,25,740/-.
Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) who affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer on the following additions:
Disallowance of interest paid on unsecured loans - Rs.8,63,000/- 2. Securities received from customers – Rs.32,00,000/- 3. Advances received from the customer – Rs.5,00,000/-
ITA No. 6848/Del/2018 3 Birla Aircon 4. Unaccounted purchases made by the assessee – Rs.8,11,817/- 5. Profit earned on unaccounted sales – Rs.27,70,641/-
Interest paid:
The assessee paid interest of Rs.10,50,000/- on account of unsecured loans which includes interest paid Rs.17,000/- each to 11 persons totaling to Rs.1,87,000/-. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest expenditure of Rs.8,63,000/- holding that the maximum loan outstanding was Rs.14,12,933/-. We hold that disallowing the interest by considering the maximum outstanding balance only is not the right way to compute the allowable interest payment. Hence, the AO is directed to take into consideration the loans taken by the assessee in allowing the interest. The assessee also shall produce the relevant bank statement of the loan parties to prove the factum of extending the loans to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside to the Assessing Officer.
Securities and Advances:
Before the revenue authorities, the assessee has failed to furnish the details of the parties from whom the securities were received. The assessee shall produce the relevant bank statement of the parties to prove the factum of extending the securities/advances to the assessee.
ITA No. 6848/Del/2018 4 Birla Aircon Stock and Profit:
This issue has got originated owing to the search conducted by Central Excise of the assessee which was subjected to series of Writ Petitions before the Hon’ble High Court and orders of the Hon’ble CESTAT. The final order has been passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise. The assessee shall produce various orders of the Central Excise authorities before the AO which the AO shall take due cognizance of determining the unaccounted stock and undeclared profit and the seed capital employed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 28/06/2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (Kul Bharat) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 28/06/2024 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
