NARESH,MANESAR vs. ITO, WARD 3(1), GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(E) is directed to consider the documents to be furnished by the assessee and grant an opportunity of being heard before passing orders.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) which was rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) for non-furnishing of certain documents. These included NOC, declaration under Section 13(1)(c), list of donors, and justification for expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) was justified due to non-furnishing of required documents? Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
O R D E R
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The matter relates to rejection of application filed in Form 10AB for grant of approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) made by the Appellant Trust by the order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions).
We have heard both the parties and also perused the relevant materials available on record. It appears that the rejection of application filed in Form 10AB for grant of approval under section Shri Sankat Mochan Balaji Mandal vs. CIT(Exemption) 80G(5)(iii) was made by the assessee on the ground of non-furnishing of certain documents. NOC from the owner of the premises from which the applicant operating charitable activity, undertaking under section 2(15) of the Act, Declaration under section 13(1)(c) of the Act, list of donors and the details of the donation received not provided. Justification of claim of approval as sought for and the bills/vouchers/photos in support of the expenses claimed by the assessee were also not provided. Under these facts and circumstances of the matter having regard to the activities rendered by the assessee, this appeal is disposed of by remitting this issue to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication of the same. Upon considering the relevant documents as sought for which are further directed to be furnished by the assessee trust before the date of hearing of the matter. The Ld. CIT(E) is further directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and to pass orders strictly in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 21.08.2025.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026