THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S IBM WORLD TRADE CORPORATION
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits specified in a CBDT circular.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment year in question was 2006-2007.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court in light of the monetary limits prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.62 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-1(1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU. ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. IBM WORLD TRADE CORPORATION C/O. BMR AND ASSOCIATES, EMBASSY ICON
2 ANNEXE, 2/1, INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY MISS: MANASA ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 17.10.2011 PASSED IN ITA NO.39/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 2007, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.39/BANG/2011, DATED 17.10.2011 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
*****
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/-
Sd/- JUDGE
JUDGE
*bgn/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026