GOLFLINKS SOFTWARE PARK (P) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the appellant's prayer for withdrawal of the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Golflinks Software Park (P) Limited, filed appeals before the High Court of Karnataka. The appeals were filed against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals filed by the appellant should be allowed to be withdrawn. The court considered the appellant's request for withdrawal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
ITA NO.83/2020 C/W ITA NO.697/2019
ITA NO.83/2020
BETWEEN:
GOLFLINKS SOFTWARE PARK (P) LIMITED 1ST FLOOR, EMBASSY POINT, 150 INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 PAN-AABCG7106K REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.P.R.RAMAKRISHNAN …APPELLANT
(BY SRI.SURYANARAYANA T., ADV.,)
AND:
INCOME-TAX OFFICER
WARD 3 (1) (2), BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BENGALURU-560 085
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BENGALURU-560 085 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.ARAVIND K.V., ADV.,)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07/02/2020, PASSED IN ITA NO.1338/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATE ABOVE (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 07/02/2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.1338/BANG/2018 (ANNEXURE-C) AND ETC.
ITA NO.697/2019
BETWEEN:
GOLFLINKS SOFTWARE PARK (P) LIMITED 1ST FLOOR, EMBASSY POINT, 150 INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 PAN-AABCG7106K REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.P.R.RAMAKRISHNAN
…APPELLANT (BY SRI.SURYANARAYANA T., ADV.,)
AND:
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 11 (3) BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BENGALURU-560 085
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING
KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
BENGALURU-560 085 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.JEEVAN J.NEERALGI, ADV.,)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10.05.2019, PASSED IN ITA NO.333/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-2008, PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE COMMN ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 10.05.2019 PASSED IN ITA NO.333/BANG/2017 (ANNEXURE-C), TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN ANNUAL YEAR 2007-2008 AND ETC.,
THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeals.
The prayer is allowed.
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026