PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-3, DELHI vs. SHARAN SVADHA LLP

PDF · subscribers
ITA/750/2023HC DelhiDLHC01052135202309 February 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal held that Section 50C of the Act is applicable only to a vendor or seller of a property, not to a purchaser. Therefore, the provision was wrongly invoked against the assessee.

What were the facts?

The Department invoked Section 50C of the Income Tax Act against the assessee, a purchaser of property, based on the stamp duty paid. The assessee had purchased the property for Rs. 7,84,00,000, while the stamp duty paid was Rs. 12,34,00,000.

What were the issues?

Whether Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applies to a purchaser of immovable property. The applicability of Section 50C to a transaction where the assessee is the buyer and not the seller.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 50C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 750/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-3, DELHI

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. SC

with Mr. Parth Semwal, SC.

versus

SHARAN SVADHA LLP

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Gaurav Jain and Mr.

Shubham Gupta, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR

KAURAV

O R D E R %

09.02.2024

1.

The Department has assailed the validity of the judgment rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [“ITAT”] dated 11 October 2022. 2. The issue itself arises out of the invocation of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”] against the respondent / assessee in respect of a transaction relating to an immovable property to which it was a party. Undisputedly, the respondent / assessee had purchased the subject property for an amount of Rs.7,84,00,000/-. The respondent / assessee took into consideration the fact that the stamp duty paid in respect of that transaction was amounting to Rs.12,34,00,000/-. It was perhaps on that basis that the Department proceeded on the premise that Section 50C of the Act would be applicable. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:08:10

3.

The ITAT has found that the aforesaid provision has been wrongly invoked bearing in mind the fact that it would apply only to an assessee who has received consideration or to whom consideration may have been paid as a result of the transfer of a capital asset. 4. Section 50C of the Act thus, on its plain language, is clearly concerned with the vendor or the seller of the property in question. The said provision can have no application to a purchaser. 5. In view of the aforesaid, we find no merit in the instant appeal. Consequently, the appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. FEBRUARY 9, 2024/p

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:08:10

More judgments on Section 50C

All 3,223 judgments and leading authorities on Section 50C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →