ADIVCE AMERICA SOFTWARE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. This was based on the assessee's decision to resolve the dispute under the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee subsequently filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
I.T.A. No. 674/2018
BETWEEN : --------------
Advice America Software Development Center Pvt. Ltd., #23 & 24, 3rd Floor AMR Tech-Park Beside Oxford College Hosur Main Road Bengaluru – 560 068 PAN – AAECA2942E Email : rashmi.jain@fiserv.com.
… APPELLANT
(By Sri. Nandakumar C.K., Adv., )
AND : -------
Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax – 1
BMTC Building
Koramangala
Bengaluru – 560 095.
The Income Tax Officer
Ward (1)(1), BMTC Building
6th Block, Koramangala
Bengaluru – 560 095.
… RESPONDENTS
---
This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act 1961 with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 23.05.2018 passed by the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT(TP)A 2531/Bang/2017 to the extent of the issues involved in the present appeal and etc.
This I.T.A. coming on for Admission this day, ALOK ARADHE J, delivered the following;
J U D G M E N T
Sri. C.K. Nandakumar, learned counsel for the assessee.
Learned counsel for the assessee submits that he has filed a memo to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the assessee has taken recourse to resolution of the dispute under the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme.
The aforesaid memo is placed on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to revive this appeal in case, occasion so arises.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
LRS.
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026