FANGLE FANNEL GLEXIBLE FOAM PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 9(1), NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 3610/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 July 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK (Judicial Member)6 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The assessee filed its return for AY 2018-19, declaring an income of Rs. 10,410/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under section 133A, and the AO made an addition of Rs. 7,19,519/- by estimating net profit at 8%, alleging non-maintenance of books. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution due to non-compliance, which the assessee contended was a denial of natural justice and proper opportunity.

Held

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. Considering the principles of natural justice and the need for a fair opportunity, the Tribunal remitted the entire matter back to the Ld. Assessing Officer. The AO is directed to re-adjudicate the case afresh after examining all relevant materials and providing the assessee with an effective opportunity of being heard, with the expectation of cooperation from the assessee.

Key Issues

1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without affording proper opportunity to the assessee. 2. Whether the AO's estimation of net profit at 8% and resulting addition was justified without rejecting books of account or bringing cogent material on record.

Sections Cited

133A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK

For Appellant: Shri Divyansh Jain, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Om Parkash, Sr. DR
Hearing: 15.05.2024Pronounced: 30.07.2024

PER SUDHIR PAREEK, JM

This appeal by Assessee is directed against the order of National

Faceless Appeal Centre , Delhi [for short hereinafter referred to as the

“(NFAC)”]/ CIT(A) dated 14.11.2023 for Assessment Year 2018-19 on the following grounds of appeal: -

Page 1 of 6

ITA No.-3610/Del/2023 Fangle Fannel Glexible Foam Pvt. Ltd.

“1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating and dismissing the appeal for non- prosecution which is gross violation of principle of natural justice. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in law in confirming addition of Rs 7,19,519/- made by estimating net profit rate of 8% by the Ld. AO on his own assumption and presumption that the appellant has not maintained the books of accounts nor get its books of accounts audited without appreciating the fact that the appellant is a Private Limited company and has duly maintained and got the books of accounts statutorily audited as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in law in confirming addition of Rs 7,19,519/- made by the AO by estimating net profit at the rate of 8% without rejecting books of account maintained by the appellant before estimating the profit @ 8% and also without bringing any cogent material on record in respect of his estimation of such profit. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the grounds of appeal.”

2.

Brief facts of the case may be summarized as that the

assessee e-filed return of income for the A.Y. 2018-19 on

23.09.2018 at the income of Rs. 10,410/-. The case was selected

for scrutiny through approval with reasons for survey under section

133A.

3.

Heard rival submissions and carefully scanned the material

available before us.

Page 2 of 6

ITA No.-3610/Del/2023 Fangle Fannel Glexible Foam Pvt. Ltd. 4. At the outset, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal

by stated that the during this appeal proceedings various notices

were issued fixing hearing on 03.10.2023, 12.10.2023, 26.10.2023

and 03.11.2023, but the appellant has not been complied to any of

the notices and also not been submitted any details/ document/

evidences in support of his ground of appeals.

5.

However, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the

appeal has been dismissed by Ld. CIT(A) by ignoring the assessee’s

request for granting further time to make submissions and filling

evidences, which were being collected and complied and thus

denying natural justice and the appeal has been dismissed without

giving fair & meaningful opportunity to the assessee of being heard.

Also the Ld. AO stated that the assessee was provided proper

opportunities for furnishing relevant details in support of income

shown in the return but all went in vain.

6.

Per contra, Learned Departmental Representative (hereinafter

referred to as ‘Ld. DR’) relied on the order passed by both lower

authorities and stated sufficient opportunity provided to assessee

before passing impugned orders.

Page 3 of 6

ITA No.-3610/Del/2023 Fangle Fannel Glexible Foam Pvt. Ltd. 7. We have carefully considered the orders passed by lower

authorities. We find that the appeal had been dismissed due to the

assessee’s failure to appear or provide documentary evidence.

8.

By hearing both side and perusing material placed before us,

we are of the humble opinion that justice should not only he done

but it appears to be done and in order to achieve the noble goal of

justice and before reaching any conclusion it is expedient to

consider, all the material/ documents in existence and produced

and whatever it is, if one more opportunity provided to assessee

/appellant, object of justice will be served to some extent. Thus, for

this purpose, we are inclined to remit back the matter to Ld. AO

with the direction to decide afresh.

9.

Consequently, matter is remitting back to the Ld. AO with the

direction to decide the matter afresh by verifying the all relevant

materials after affording more effective, meaningful and sufficient

opportunity of being heard to the assessee. At the same time,

assessee / appellant shall co-operate in proceedings and will not

seek unnecessary adjournments for ensuring expeditious disposal

of the matter. Assessee / appellant is at liberty to file / submit any

documents / evidence etc. in support of his claim. Page 4 of 6

ITA No.-3610/Del/2023 Fangle Fannel Glexible Foam Pvt. Ltd. 10. In the result, this appeal is allowed as indicated above for

statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 30.07.2024

Sd/- Sd/- (S RIFAUR RAHMAN) (SUDHIR PAREEK) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30/07/2024. Pooja/-

FANGLE FANNEL GLEXIBLE FOAM PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs ITO WARD 9(1), NEW DELHI | BharatTax