No AI summary yet for this case.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:41874-DB ITA No. 154 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 154 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3RD FLOOR, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 560001
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2 (1), 3RD FLOOR, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 560001 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE A/W SRI. RAVIRAJ Y V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI KASIREDDY RANADHEER REDDY NO. 5/19, KURAVAPALLI (V) T SUNDUPALLI, GUDDAPAH 516 214, ANDHRA PRADESH, PAN AMCPR 4790E …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGHARISH G S.,ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE, ALLOW THE
Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC:41874-DB ITA No. 154 of 2023
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 264/BANG/2022 DATED 26/09/2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018 ANNEXURE - C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1) , BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Heard the learned counsel Sri. Dilip M. along with Sri.Raviraj Y.V., for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Sri.Nagharish G.S.,
learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.
The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) questioning the correctness and legality of order dated 26.09.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Appellate Authority’) in ITA No.264/Bang/2022 for the assessment year 2017-18, raising the following substantial question of law:
- 3 -
NC: 2024:KHC:41874-DB ITA No. 154 of 2023
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances that the Tribunal’s order is perverse in holding that the Assessing Officer is not correct in passing the rectification under section 154 of the Act enhancing the tax liability of the assessee under section 115BBE and deleted the same ignoring that conditions prescribed for rectification as required under section 154 was fully satisfied considering the facts and material on which established that all conditions required for invoking Section 115BBE of the Act?”
Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.2 Crores and therefore, the appeal should not be entertained at the instance of the revenue in view of the Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It is also submitted that the aforesaid Circular binds the revenue.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions under the aforesaid Circular dated 17.09.2024 and Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024.
In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for
- 4 -
NC: 2024:KHC:41874-DB ITA No. 154 of 2023
the revenue. However, the questions of law is kept open to be adjudicated in an appropriate proceeding.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
BS List No.: 4 Sl No.: 31