Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
223 IN
PRINCIPAL C
M/S KUDU K
CORAM: H
H Present: M
* SANJEEV PR
C issued by the Revenue, Ce No.9/2024, th the departmen Court have be following step d a a Sr. No. 1. 2. 3. N THE HIGH COURT OF PU CHANDIG I D COMMISSIONER OF INCOME KNIT PROCESSOR PVT. LTD., L
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Stand for the appellant-Income Tax Dep Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advoc Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate a Mr. Yugank Goyal, Advocate for **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant submi e Government of India, Minist entral Board of Direct Taxe he enhancement of monetary lim nt before the ITAT, High Court een amended and the Circular N ps have been taken with the purp “ 2. As a step towards mana decided by the Board to revise th appeals in Income-tax cases as aforementioned Circular as follows Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax ma Before Income Tax Appellate Trib Before High Court Before Supreme Court
NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH ITA-210-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.09.2024 E TAX-1, LUDHIANA
..…...Appellant (s) V/s. LUDHIANA.
…......Respondent(s) NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH ding Counsel, partment. cate, assisted by and r the respondent. its that in terms of the Circular try of Finance, Department of es dated 17.09.2024 bearing mits for filing of the appeals by t and SLPs before the Supreme No.5/2024 has been amended and pose to manage litigations: agement of litigation, it has been he monetary limits for filing of s stated in Para 4.1 of the s: atters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) bunal 60 lakh 2 crore 5 crore
) ) r f g y e d Suresh Kumar 2024.09.20 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
ITA-210-2016 to th e 1 o l 2. T issuance of SLPs/appeals and also apply and Tribunal, 3. L no exception, No.5/2024. Th 4. A and the appea 5. A accordingly. September 18 Ess Kay 1. Whethe 2. Whethe Page 2 of 2 6 (O&M)
Monetary limits given in p o filing appeal/SLP shall be app hose relating to TDS/TCS under t exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3. 15.03.2024, where the decision to on merits, without regard to the imits.”
The modifications have come Circular i.e. 17.09.2024, an to be filed before the Supreme y to the appeals pending before which may have been directed t Learned counsel relies on the ci as the case does not fall within hus, he prays for withdrawal of t Accordingly, we allowed the pra al stands dismissed as withdrawn All pending applications also
(SANJ , 2024 r speaking/reasoned?
Y r reportable?
Y paragraph 2 above with regard plicable to all cases including the Income-tax Act, 1961 with 2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated appeal/file SLP shall be taken tax effect and the monetary into effect from the date of nd therefore shall apply to Court, High Court and Tribunal the Supreme Court, High Court to be withdrawn. ircular and submits that there is the exception clause of Circular the present appeal. ayer of counsel for the appellant, n. stand dismissed as withdrawn JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
f o l t s r , n Suresh Kumar 2024.09.20 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document