YOURE ARE WOUNDERFUL PROJECT ,DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), DELHI
Facts
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the CIT(Exemption) dated 04.07.2023, which rejected their application for 80G(5)(iii) registration and cancelled their 12AB registration. The assessee contended that these orders were passed summarily without providing a proper opportunity of being heard.
Held
The Tribunal observed that denying an opportunity of hearing would cause prejudice to the assessee, and providing one would not harm the Revenue. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) to pass a fresh order after affording the assessee an adequate opportunity to present their case.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting and cancelling registrations under sections 80G(5)(iii) and 12AB, respectively, without providing the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.
Sections Cited
80G(5)(iii), 12AB, 12A(1)(ac)(iii), 12A(1)(ac)(vi)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Sudhir Pareek
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Sh. Sudhir Pareek, Judicial Member ITA No. 729/Del/2024 : Asstt. Year : 2023-24 ITA No. 730/Del/2024 : Asstt. Year : 2023-24 Youre Are Wounderful Project, Vs CIT(Exemption), 34-A, 2nd Floor, Cabin No. 4, Milenium New Delhi-110001 Business Centre, Corner Market, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-110017 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAATY6697H Assessee by : Sh. Priyansh Jain, CA Revenue by : Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR (adjournment sought) Date of Hearing: 29.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 31.07.2024 ORDER Per Bench: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of ld. CIT(Exemption), Delhi dated 04.07.2023. 2. In ITA No. 729/Del/2024, following grounds have been raised by the assessee:
“On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per the provisions of the law, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions ("Ld. CIT(E)") has erred in not granting registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) is hereby rejected without granting proper opportunity of being heard. 2. On the facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per the provisions of the law, Ld. CIT(E) has erred in rejecting the application filed by the Appellant in Form 10AB for approval u/s 80G(5)(iii)) of the Income tax act,
ITA Nos. 729 & 730/Del/2024 2 Youre Are Wounderful Project 1961 and order passed u/s clause (ii)(b)(B) of second proviso to section 80G(5) is improper, unwarranted, unjustified and contrary to the provision of the Act and facts prevailing in the case.” 3. In ITA No. 730/Del/2024, following grounds have been raised by the assessee:
“1. On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per the provisions of the law, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions ("Ld. CIT(E)") has erred in cancelling registration granted u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) is hereby rejected without granting proper opportunity of being heard. 2. On the facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per the provisions of the law, Ld. CIT(E) has erred in rejecting the application filed by the Appellant in Form IOAB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income tax act, 1961 and order passed u/s 12AB(1 cancellation of the registration granted u/s 12AB r.w.s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) is improper, unwarranted, unjustified and contrary to the provision of the Act and facts prevailing in the case.” 4. At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee could not make their submissions before the ld. CIT(E) and hence, the order has been passed summarily rejecting the application of the assessee.
We have gone through the order of the rejection passed b y the ld. CIT(E) and of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to the Revenue if an opportunity of being heard is given to the assessee. Hence, the matter is remanded to ld. CIT(E) to pass an order de novo after affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
ITA Nos. 729 & 730/Del/2024 3 Youre Are Wounderful Project 6. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 31/07/2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (Sudhir Pareek) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 31/07/2024 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
