THE PR. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT.SUREDDY VENKATA RAMANA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the Department's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn without any costs.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Department later filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Department's decision to withdraw the appeal based on its litigation policy regarding monetary stakes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 196 OF 2018 Between: The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur ...APPELLANT AND Smt.Sureddy Venkata Ramana, D.No.11-01-20,Chenchupet, Tenali-522202 ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961, preferred against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, passed in ITA.No.138A/izag/2014,dated 30-08- 2017,for A.Y.2007-08. Counsel for the Appellant INCOMETAX) : SRI Y N VIVEKA NANDA (SC FOR Counsel for the Respondents : CKR ASSOCIATES The Court made the following ORDER ;
APHC010051822018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI {Special Original Jurisdiction) [3507] TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 196/2018 Between: The Pr. Comissioner Of Income Tax ...APPELLANT AND Smt Sureddy Venkata Ramana ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.(SC FOR INCOMETAX) Counsel for the Respondent: 1.CKR ASSOCIATES
r ■ ' % The Court made the following; (per Hon ble Sri Justice G Narendar) The learned counsel for the appellant-Department has filed a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, the appellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy and under the said policy, it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals or petitions, where the monetary stakes involved are less than Rs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. Submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No 3. costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. SD/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam 2. The Commissioner of Income-Tax -1, Visakhapatnam, 3. OneCCtoSRI Y.N.VIVEKANANDA(SCFORINCOMETAX) [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. CKR ASSOCIATES Advocate [OPUC] 5. THREE CD COPIES TAC
▼ ^ * HIGH COURT DATED:19/11/2024 ORDER nTA.No.196of 2018 -•S g 2 5 FEB 2025 | ->,1 , Current Section ^ i.°A.SPATC«<=^-' DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026