TTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. SMT. VALLABHANENI HEMALATHA, VIJAYAWADA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the Income Tax Department's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn based on the CBDT's circular regarding monetary limits.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The appeal was filed challenging orders from various lower authorities concerning a block period. The Assessing Officer certified that the appeal needed to be withdrawn due to falling below monetary limits.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to falling below the monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 238 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow the appeal by duly setting aside the Order dated 29.04.2011 passed in IT(S.S.)A. No. 1A/izag/2010 (Block Period 01.04.1996 to 14.02.2003) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam filed challenging the Order dated 14.09.2010 passed in ITA No.45/TR/CIT(A)A/JA/10-11 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada, which filed against the Order dated 28.07.2009 passed in H-705/CCA/JA/2009-10 by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Vijayawada, which filed against the order dated 15.11.2007 in ITA No. 0434/CC-VIJ/CIT(A)- 1/06-07 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Hyderabad, which filed against the order dated 26.09.2006 U/s. 143(3) read with Section 158 BD & 158 BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Assistant Commissioned of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada. Between: The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada ...APPELLANT /RESPONDENT
.s-ts if; AND Smt. Vallabhaneni Hemalatha, 74-12-7, New R.T.C.Colony, Patamata Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENT / APPELLANT : SRI Y N VIVEKANANDA (SC FOR INCOME TAX) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A V A SIVA KARTIKEYA The Court made the following JUDGMENT : • ......
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. NARENDAR AND HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA l■T■T■A.No.238 of 2017 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Narendar) Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, has filed into Court a copy of the Certificate issued by the Assessing Officer/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Vijayawada, certifying that the instant appeal needs to be withdrawn as the tax effect involved falls below the monetary limits fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.09/2024, F.No.279/Misc./M-74/2024-ITJ dated 17.09.2024, and that the appeal does not fall under the exceptions prescribed under Para-3.1 & 3.2 of the Board’s Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024. Learned counsel, therefore, prays leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. Leave 2. granted. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. As a sequel, pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs^ ^I^MESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SD/- //true copy// SECTION OFFICER Bench To. Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Tax Appellate 1. The Income Visakhapatnam T- -
7 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada, 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Vijayawada, 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Hyderabad, 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada. 6. One CC to Sri Y N Vivekananda (SC for Income Tax) Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri A V A Siva Kartikeya Advocate [OPUC] 8. THREE CD COPIES psr TAG i
l' ! f HIGH COURT DATED:25/11/2024 ji I JUDGMENT ITTA.No.238 of 2017 5 % DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN i
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026