M/S KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted the appellant's submission of declarations under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and the issuance of a Form-3 certificate. Consequently, the court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Karnataka Vikasa Grameena Bank, filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an ITAT order. The appellant subsequently filed declarations under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, for the disputed income.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appellant's intention to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI I.T.A.NO.100003/2021
BETWEEN:
M/S KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CHANDRASHEKAR D. MORO, HEAD OFFICE, H.O. BUILDING, BELAGAUM ROAD, DHARWAD. …..APPELLANT (BY SRI SHASHANK S. HEGDE, ADV.)
AND : ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, HUBBALLI. …..RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE ASSESSEE IN THE COMMON
ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU C BENCH IN ITA NOS.2054/Bang/2017 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15 VUDE ANNEXURES-A.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The counsel for the appellant has filed a memo, which reads as follows: 1. The above named Appellant has filed Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench in ITA No.2054/Bang/2017 dated 10.09.2020 for the Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Year. 3. Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner for Income-Tax, Hubli issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section
5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 dated 19.04.2021, after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. Copy of the Form-3 is enclosed herewith for this Hon’ble Court’s reference and records. 4. Wherefore, in view of the above submissions the Appellant humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Income Tax Appeal with liberty to revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest of justice and equity. In light of the same, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE Naa
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026