Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
O – 75 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/90/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, KOLKATA VS DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 30th April, 2024
Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ...for the appellant.
Smt. Taniya Roy, Adv. ..for the respondent.
Heard Smt. Taniya Roy, advocate holding the brief of Sri Tanmay Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. Sri Tilak Mitra, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant is present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant states, on instructions, that the matter has been settled under the (Direct Tax) Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2020 and, as such, the appeal has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/assessee does not dispute the aforesaid position. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
The photostat copy of Form V, as produced by learned counsel for the appellant, is kept on record.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
Sd/