M/S NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PDF · subscribers
ITA/1093/2017HC KarnatakaKAHC01048860201718 March 2025Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT,RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The respondent had no objection to the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The appellant, Nike India Private Ltd., filed an appeal challenging an ITAT order. The appellant later availed the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, for the assessment year 2007-08.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn as settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:11035-DB ITA No. 1093 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2017 BETWEEN:

M/S. NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LTD., NO.701, MILLENIA TOWERS, MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.R. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE) AND:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(2), BANGALORE. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALAGI, ADVOCATE)

THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 04.08.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO. 1338/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-2008, VIDE ANNEXURE-A PRAYING TO A) TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT.

Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:11035-DB ITA No. 1093 of 2017

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/assessee submits that the lis involved in this appeal has been settled in terms of 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' and therefore, the appeal be accordingly disposed off. To this effect, he has filed a memo dated 27.02.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal, which reads as under:

"The Appellant submits that the above appeal was filed challenging the order dated 04.08.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT (TP) A No.1338/Bang/2011 for the assessment year 2007-08.

The Appellant in the top noted appeal, humbly submits that it has availed the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 ('DTVSV Scheme' for short) of the Government of India and has filed the necessary application before the Respondent for the Assessment year ('AY' for short) 2007-08. The

- 3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:11035-DB ITA No. 1093 of 2017

Respondent has accepted the application of the Appellant and has issued the Form 2 under the DTVSV Scheme determining the amount payable towards the full and final settlement of the tax arrear. The copy of the Form 2 issued by the Respondent is produced herewith as Annexure-1. Given the same, the Appellant does not want to pursue the subject appeal.

Therefore, the Appellant seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above appeal and prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to take the memo on record and dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn, in the interests of justice and equity".

2.

The learned Panel Counsel, Shri.Jeevan J.Neeralagi has no objection for granting leave to withdraw the appeal. 3. In the above circumstances, the appeal is disposed off as having been withdrawn, in terms of the memo. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE

Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE

DH, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →