J & G ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-13(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Considering the subsequent relief granted by the NFAC, the Tribunal determined that the present appeal had become infructuous. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an NFAC order from January 2024, stemming from an ITO order under Section 154 for AY 2011-12. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel informed the Tribunal that the NFAC Delhi had already granted relief to the assessee through a separate order dated June 21, 2024, passed under Section 147 r.w. Section 144 of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the ITAT becomes infructuous if the assessee has already received relief from the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) through a subsequent order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, DELHI
Before: MS.MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 03.01.2024 arising out of the order dated 01.02.2019 passed under Section 154 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the ITO, Ward 13(1) Delhi, for Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the time of hearing of the instant appeal the ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before us that relief has been granted by the NFAC Delhi in favour to the assessee by and under P a g e | J & G Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 13(1)
its order dated 21.06.2024 under Section 147 r.w.Section 144 of the Act, a copy whereof has been filed before us.
Having regard to this particular facts and circumstances of the matter, the present appeal is found to be infructuous. Thus the appeal is dismissed as infructous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 07.08.2024
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026