PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4 DELHI vs. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA/326/2025HC DelhiDLHC01100743202322 August 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the AO, after the remand, decided the issue in favor of the assessee and the Revenue did not appeal this decision. Therefore, nothing further remained in the present appeal.

What were the facts?

The ITAT had remanded an issue related to Section 80G of the Income Tax Act back to the Assessing Officer (AO). The assessee was directed to furnish documentary evidence to the AO for examination.

What were the issues?

Whether the ITAT correctly remanded the issue of Section 80G to the AO, and the subsequent outcome of that remand.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 326/2025 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4 DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Parth Samwal, Jr. SCs, Ms Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Nischay Purohit Advs. Versus MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mrs. Husnal Syali Nagi and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R %

22.08.2025 1. This appeal lays a challenge to the order dated 14.07.2022 passed in ITA No. 4479/DEL/2019, which is an appeal filed by the Assessee/respondent, wherein the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has on the issue relatable to Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer by stating in paragraph 12 of the impugned order as under : “12. We are of the considered opinion that the documentary evidences submitted by the assessee before the CIT(A) go to the root of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2025 at 12:41:21

the matter the same ought to have been admitted by the CIT(A}. In the interest of justice ·we set aside this issue to the files of the AO. The assessee is directed to furnish the necessary documentary evidences before the AO and the AO is directed to examine/ verify the same and decide the issue as per the provisions of the law.” 2. We have been informed by the counsel for the parties that pursuant to the remand, the Assessing Officer has decided the issue in favour of the respondent and no appeal has been filed by the Revenue/Appellant before the CIT appeals. 3. If that be so, nothing survives in the present appeal. Same is closed. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J VINOD KUMAR, J AUGUST 22, 2025 dd This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2025 at 12:41:21

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →