COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA XIX vs. KARTICK CHANDRA DHAR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as the tax effect was below the CBDT threshold. The substantial questions of law were kept open.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against an ITAT order that upheld the deletion of disallowances for carriage charges and wages. The disallowances were made under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The ITAT also directed the AO to estimate profit at 5% of gross receipts.
What were the issues?
Whether the ITAT erred in deleting disallowances for carriage charges and wages due to non-deduction of TDS. Whether the ITAT erred in directing profit estimation based on no material.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
OD–5 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/170/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XIX VS. KARTICK CHANDRA DHAR BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 2nd March, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …for appellant The Court : - This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 08.4.2011 passed by the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A. No. 1595 /Kol/2010 for the Assessment Year 2006-2007. This appeal was admitted by order dated September 28, 2011 on the following substantial question of law : (i) ‘Whether the learned Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of expenses made under the head “carriage charge” of Rs.21,83,220/- under Section 40(a)(ia) for which TDS has not been deducted under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without deciding the same question at all? (ii) Whether the learned Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in upholding the order of CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of expenses made under the head “wages” in respect of Rs.10,44,230/- without deciding the same question at all ?
2 (iii) Whether the learned Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in directing the assessing officer to estimate the profit of the assessee at 5 percent of the gross receipts which is based on no material?’ The learned Advocate for the revenue submits as per written instruction received from the department that the tax effect involved in the instant appeal is Rs.8,29,450/- which is far below the threshold limit as would be evident from the Circular issued by the C.B.D.T. In view of the above, the revenue cannot pursue this appeal any further. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed and the substantial questions of law are kept open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) Pkd/GH.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026