Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee's applications were summarily rejected by the CIT(Exemption) without considering the merits of the case or the objects of the society. These rejections led to the filing of the present appeals by the assessees.
Held
The tribunal remanded the cases back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication on merits, instructing the CIT(Exemption) to pass speaking orders after duly considering relevant judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court. The assessee was directed to comply promptly with notices issued by the CIT(Exemption).
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in summarily rejecting the assessee's application without examining its merits and objects, necessitating a remand for re-adjudication.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Sudhir Kumar
ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeals have been filed by the assessees against the orders of ld. CIT(Exemption), Delhi dated 30.03.2024.
On going through the record, we find that the ld. CIT(E) has summarily rejected the application of the assessee without going into the merits of the case and objects of the society.
, 2734, 2735 & 2736/Del/2024 2 Yuj Arts & Xander India Foundation Hence, in the interest of justice, the case is being remanded to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to adjudicate the issue on merits by passing a speaking order considering the judgments of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ananda Social & Educational Trust Vs. CIT, 114 Taxman 293, Self-Employer’s Service Society Vs. CIT, 113 Taxman 703 and also the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of in M/s New Noble Educational Society Vs. CCIT (CA No. 3795 of 2014) to examine the objects of the society. The assessee shall comply to the notices issued by the ld. CIT(E) promptly without seeking any unnecessary adjournments.
In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 22/08/2024.