SOLUTIONS INTEGRATED MARKETING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2852/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 August 2024AY 2011-12Bench: SHRI KUL BHARAT (Judicial Member), SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH (Accountant Member)9 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that credit for TDS can only be granted in the assessment year in which the corresponding income is assessed to tax. The assessee was directed to approach the AO for claiming TDS credit in the concerned year.

What were the facts?

The assessee's sales as per the Profit & Loss account did not match the total sales reflected in TDS certificates, leading to an addition by the AO. The assessee claimed this was due to accounting standards and timing differences in revenue recognition versus TDS deduction.

What were the issues?

Whether TDS credit can be claimed in an assessment year where the corresponding income is not offered to tax. Whether other grounds raised by the assessee regarding business loss, interest, and penalty should be adjudicated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 199,Section 244A,Section 234B,Section 234D,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

Hearing: 07.08.2024Pronounced: 22.08.2024

per law.

12.

With respect to ground no.5.4, the AO is directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to levy interest u/s 234B of the Act as per law.

13.

With respect to ground no.5.5, the AO is directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to levy interest u/s 234D of the Act as per law.

14.

With respect to ground no.5.6, the assessee has requested for dropping of initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. This ground is premature in nature. The assessee would get independent notice for initiation of penalty and it has a remedy of appeal against the imposition of any penalty. Hence, this ground is rejected.

15.

In the result, this appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 199

All 535 judgments and leading authorities on Section 199 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →