ZAD EDUCATION SOCIETY,ROHTAK vs. CIT, ITO EXEMPTION, ROHTAK
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal noted that a subsequent CBDT Circular No. 07/2024, dated April 25, 2024, had extended the due date for filing Form 10A/10AB to June 30, 2024. In light of this, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and remanded the matter for fresh determination of the application's maintainability, allowing the assessee to furnish further explanation and evidence.
What were the facts?
Zad Education Society applied for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on September 29, 2023. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) rejected the application on March 19, 2024, considering it time-barred as per clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Rejection of application for approval under Section 80G(5) as time-barred, and the applicability of a subsequent CBDT circular extending the filing due date for Form 10AB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “H” DELHI
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - A.M.: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh [CIT(E)] dated 19.03.2024 passed under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
As per the grounds of appeal, the assessee has challenged the order dated 19.03.2024 passed by CIT(E) denying approval of the Trust sought under Section 80G(5) of the Act.
On perusal of the records, it is observed that the assessee has filed an application for approval of the Trust under Section 80G(5) of the Act electronically on 29.09.2023 in prescribed Form No.10AB r.w. Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The CIT(E) however rejected the application as not maintainable in the light of embargo placed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub- section (5) of Section 80G of the Act.
When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared for the assessee. It is seen from the record that opportunities were given in the past as well. Accordingly, the matter is proceeded ex- parte.
The submissions made on behalf of the Revenue are reproduced hereunder:
“That, on 29.09.2023, the applicant namely Zad Education Society submitted Form 10AB electronically, seeking approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The perusal of records show that the trust was incorporated on 20.08.2013, and provisional approval was granted on 30.06.2022, valid until A.Y 2025-26. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) dismissed the application, citing that it was not filed within the prescribed time limit under Section 80G(S)(iii). In Para No. 9.2 of the order, the CIT(E) has stated that as per Circular No.6 of 2023, there was no extension in due date for filing Form 10AB under clause (iii) of the first proviso to subsection (5) of Section 80G of the Act. Accordingly, the application of the applicant was considered time barred. Notably, the CBDT has issued Circular No. 07/2024 dated 25.04.2024, extending the due date for filing Form 10A/10AB from 30.09.2023 to 30.06.2024 including Form 10AB field clause (iii) of the first proviso to subsection (5) of Section 80G of the act. The CIT(E) has informed verbally that a revised Form 10AB has been received in the case of the applicant. Accordingly, the present appeal become infructuous. The Hon'ble Bench may either dismiss the appeal or set it aside to CIT(E), as deem fit.”
In the light of the submissions made on behalf of the Revenue, the matter is set aside to the CIT(E) for fresh determination of the maintainability of the application and approval sought under Section 80G of the Act. It shall be open to the assessee to furnish such explanation and adduce such evidence before the CIT(E) as may be advised. The CIT(E) shall pass speaking order after giving reasonable opportunity.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed ex-parte for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27 August, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026