M/S. VIDYANIDHI EDUCATION TRUST,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the accumulation under Section 11(1)(a) should be computed on gross receipts, not net receipts. This decision followed previous judgments from the Tribunal and the Kerala High Court.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust claimed deduction of 15% under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) allowed this deduction on net receipts, whereas the assessee claimed it on gross receipts.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the 15% accumulation under Section 11(1)(a) should be calculated on the gross receipts or the net receipts of the trust.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Programme for Community Organisation73 citing228 ITR 620 · 1997 · HC
- Bai Sonabai Hirji Agiary Trust v. ITO39 citing93 ITD 70 · 2005 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU BENCH B, BENGALURU
Before: SHRI. JASON P. BOAZ
PER LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
The present appeal is filed by the assessee trust against the order of the CIT (A)-14, LTU, Bengaluru, dt.06.03.2017, for the assessment year 2012-13, on the following grounds :
ITA.1380/Bang/2017 Page - 2
The issue of deduction of 15% u/s.11(1)(a) whether to be calculated on the gross receipts and not on amount left after application towards expenses incurred for objects of the trust, had come up before the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the assessee’s own case, in for the assessment year 2011-12, which was decided in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal in paras 3 to 5 had observed as under : 3. It was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that although the assessee has raised as many as 7 grounds of appeal but the only issue involved in this appeal is this that whether the assessee is eligible for accumulation u/s. 11(1)(a) of the IT Act to the extent of 15% of gross receipts or net receipts. In this regard, he placed reliance on tribunal order rendered in the case of Jyothy Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Exemptions) in ITA No. ITA.1380/Bang/2017 Page - 3 662/Bang/2015 dated 14.08.2015. He submitted a copy of this tribunal order and drawn our attention to page nos. 10 & 11 of this tribunal order and pointed out that the tribunal in this case has followed the decision of special bench of the tribunal rendered in the case of Bai Sonabai Hirji Agiary Trust Vs. ITO as reported in 93 ITD 70 (SB). He also submitted that the relevant portion of this tribunal order has been reproduced by the tribunal and as per the same, the tribunal has followed the judgment of Hon’ble Kerala High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Programme for Community Organisation as reported in 228 ITR 620 (Kerala).
The ld. DR of revenue supported the order of authorities below.
We have considered the rival submissions. We find that as per the assessment order, this is the only objection of the AO that instead of the assessee’s claim for accumulation u/s. 11(1)(a) of the IT Act to the extent of 15% of gross receipts of the assessee, the assessee is eligible for such accumulation only to the extent of 15% of net receipts. On this aspect, the judgment of Kerala High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Programme for Community Organisation (supra) supports the case of the assessee because it was held in this case that the accumulation u/s. 11(1)(a) of the IT Act has to be computed at 25% of gross receipts. Now as per the amendments in the law, percentage is reduced to 15% but the other things remains same. Therefore, respectfully following this judgment of the tribunal and in turn following the judgment of special bench of the tribunal and in turn following the judgment of Hon’ble Kerala High Court, we direct the AO to allow accumulation u/s. 11(1)(a) of the IT Act to the extent of 15% of gross receipts in place of 15% of net income allowed by him.
Following the above decision of the coordinate bench, we direct the AO to allow accumulation u/s.11(1)(a) of the IT Act to the extent of 15% of gross receipts in place of 15% of net income.
ITA.1380/Bang/2017 Page - 4
More judgments on Section 11(1)(a)
- Sri Vidyanikethan Educational Trust… vs DCIT Exemption Cir, VijayawadaITA 412/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Porwal Charitable Trust, Thane vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 7604/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Jain Citizen Education Society, Surendra… vs ITO, Ward-2, Exmp, AhmedabadITA 737/AHD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Vanita Samaj, Mumbai vs Jurisdiction Exem Ward 2(4), MumbaiITA 8116/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026