ASTRA EXIM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 9(1)(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5685/MUM/2016Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 July 2018AY 2007-082 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee's counsel submitted that they wished to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objection, and the Tribunal granted permission for the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) concerning a disputed demand. The assessee's grounds of appeal primarily related to the CIT(A)'s failure to grant a stay on the disputed demand.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in not granting a stay on the disputed demand and whether the CIT(A) possessed the power to grant such a stay.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM

For Appellant: Shri Akash Kumar, Shri S. K. Saikia
For Respondent: Shri S. K. Saikia

O R D E R Per Shamim Yahya, A. M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 16.08.2016, pertaining to the assessment year 2007-08.

2.

The grounds of appeal

read as under:

1.

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not granting the stay of disputed demand of Rs.29,97,91,880/-.

2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A)failed to appreciate that the Ld. CIT(A) have inherited power to grant the stay.

3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in directing to approach the Assessing Officer for stay of demand when he himself have power to grant the stay of demand.

M/s. Astra Exim Pvt. Ltd. 4. The assessee craves leave to add further grounds or to amend or alter the existing grounds of appeal on or before the date of hearing.

3. At the outset in this case the learned counsel of the assessee submitted that he shall be withdrawing the appeal.

4.

The ld. Departmental Representative did not have any objection to this proposition.

5.

Upon careful consideration, we have granted permission to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 02.07.2018 Sd/- Sd/- (Sandeep Gosain) (Shamim Yahya) �या�यक सद�य / Judicial Member लेखा सद�य / Accountant Member मुंबई Mumbai; �दनांक Dated : 02.07.2018 व.�न.स./Roshani, Sr. PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent 2. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. आयकर आयु�त / CIT - concerned 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard File 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →