SHREE RADHA KRISHAN GOPAL MANDIR TRUST MANDWARA,CHANDIGARH vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence and restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(E). The CIT(E) was directed to reconsider the assessee's application for registration after considering the new evidence and providing an opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the CIT(E)'s order rejecting their application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The assessee requested to admit additional evidence and set aside the matter for reconsideration.
What were the issues?
Whether additional evidence should be admitted in an appeal against an order rejecting registration under Section 12AA, and if so, whether the matter should be remanded for reconsideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per Sudhanshu Srivastava, Judicial Member:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee challenging the order dated 24.10.2019 passed u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') rejecting the assessee’s application for Registration u/s 12AA of the Act. This order has been passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [herein referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] Chandigarh. -Chd-2019- Shree Radha Krishan Gopal Trust Mandwara, Chandigarh 2 2. At the outset, the Ld. Authorised Representative (AR) submitted that the assessee has moved an application dated 3.11.2021 requesting admission of additional evidence in this case. It was submitted that the documents which were being submitted as additional evidence were being filed as per the observations of the Ld. CIT(E) in the impugned order. It was submitted that in the interest of substantial justice, the additional evidences may be admitted and the issue may be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for the purpose of reconsideration of the assessee’s prayer for registration.
Per contra, the Ld. CIT DR had no objection, if the additional evidence was admitted and the matter was restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for the purpose of reconsideration of assessee’s application for registration.
Having heard both the parties on the issue of admission of additional evidence and after duly considering the fact that at this juncture the assessee is only seeking admission of additional evidence, therefore, without going into the merits of the case, we restore the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) after duly admitting the additional evidences and direct the Ld. CIT(E) to consider these additional evidences at the time of the reconsideration of the assessee’s application for registration u/s 12AA of the Act. Needless to say that Ld. CIT(E) will also be providing proper opportunity to the assessee to present its case before passing the order in accordance with law. -Chd-2019- Shree Radha Krishan Gopal Trust Mandwara, Chandigarh 3
In the final result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 17.01.2022.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026